Skip to content
— ✱ CYBER · AI SECURITY

Red-teaming for the era of LLMs and agents.

Prompt injection, jailbreaks, data exfiltration via tool calls, model denial-of-service, supply-chain attacks on training data. AI security needs a different toolkit — and we have built it for production deployments.

What this is in 60 seconds

AI features have a new attack surface: prompts, retrieval inputs, tool calls, training data, model artefacts. We red-team your AI deployments — find the prompt injections that exfiltrate data, the tool-use chains that escalate privilege, the system-prompt leaks that betray architecture.

What you get
  • ·AI threat model for your specific deployment (model, RAG corpus, tools, agents)
  • ·Adversarial prompt library tested against your system
  • ·Tool-call abuse + privilege-escalation testing (for agents)
  • ·PII / system-prompt leakage assessment
  • ·Training-data + supply-chain risk review
  • ·Recommendations for guardrails, input/output filters, monitoring
  • ·Re-test post-remediation
Tooling we work with
  • Custom adversarial prompt corpora
  • Garak (open-source LLM scanner)
  • NeMo Guardrails / Rebuff / Lakera (defensive)
  • Promptfoo (eval framework)
  • PyRIT (Microsoft) for systematic adversarial testing
How we work
// 01Threat model (1 week)

Map your AI system's attack surface — inputs, outputs, tools, training corpus, model artefacts.

// 02Adversarial probing (week 2-3)

Run prompt injection, jailbreaks, indirect injection via retrieval, exfil via tool calls.

// 03Tool-chain exploitation (agents)

For agent systems: find chains that escalate privilege, abuse multi-step decisions, exfil via side channels.

// 04Report + remediation

Detailed findings + recommended guardrails + monitoring controls.

// 05Re-test

Validate fixes are effective and have not introduced regressions.

Compliance mappings
  • OWASP LLM Top 10
  • NIST AI RMF
  • MITRE ATLAS (adversarial AI)
  • EU AI Act high-risk categorisation
Sample artifact

AI Threat Model + Findings Report — diagrams of your AI system's data flow + trust boundaries, a finding-by-finding writeup of every successful adversarial probe (with exact prompts that worked, conditions, impact), and a prioritized remediation roadmap.

Frequently asked
Is this just normal pen-testing?+

No. Traditional pen-tests don't evaluate prompt injection, retrieval poisoning, model extraction, or agent-tool privilege escalation. This is a distinct discipline.

Do you do this for Claude / GPT / Gemini deployments equally?+

Yes. The attacks differ slightly by provider, but the categories — prompt injection, exfil, tool abuse — are universal.

Can you help us build the defenses?+

Yes — we cross-link with /ai/ai-development for the build side. AI red-team + AI dev together gives you a defensible posture.

Next step

Talk to a senior engineer about your AI Security & Red-Teaming engagement.